Tuesday, September 30, 2008

Dunwoody City Council Meeting - Wed 7 p.m. @ Peachtree Charter Middle School.

Dunwoody City Council Meeting
Wednesday, October 1, 2008
7:00 p.m.
Peachtree Middle School
4664 N. Peachtree Road
Dunwoody, Georgia 30338

Agenda & Attachments.

There will be 30 minutes of comments at the beginning of the meeting and additional comments at the end.
  1. Consideration of approval of a Resolution adopting and approving the City Council Rules and Procedures.

  2. Consideration of approval of a Resolution appointing an Acting City Clerk.

  3. Consideration of approval of a Resolution appointing an Acting City Attorney.

  4. Consideration of approval of Resolution approving a City Seal for the City of Dunwoody.

  5. Consideration of approval of Resolution designating Legal Organ for official publication and notices of the City.

  6. Consideration of approval of Resolution adopting a Regular Meeting and Work Session Schedule for the City Council.

  7. Consideration of approval of Resolution adopting the City of Dunwoody Mission Statement, Vision and Values Statement.

  8. Consideration of approval of Ordinance providing for the continuation of ordinances and law during the legislatively established transition period for the City of Dunwoody.

  9. Consideration of approval of Ordinance adopting Chapter 1 (General Provisions) of the City of Dunwoody Code of Ordinances.

  10. Consideration of approval of Ordinance adopting Chapter 2 (Administration) of the City of Dunwoody Code of Ordinances.

  11. Discussion of the contract with Boyken International for implementation of City services.

  12. Consideration of approval of Resolution approving and adopting the contract with CH2MHill for implementation of City services.

2 comments:

John Heneghan said...

The City Council was just provided this proposal from Boyken International in order to be informed regarding item 11 on the agenda of this evenings meeting.

Boyken Proposal

Unknown said...

Boyken's proposal "feels" solid with 2 suggestions for their project management approach to adjust it for a new city setting.

First, they'll need a more robust and active communication plan for the council and community. Something they seem to know how to do but it isn't prominent enough in their proposal. Second, they will need to make the risk register component of their project management approach more visible and active. Again, I suspect it's part of their core compentencies yet it's not visible in their proposal.

Just two suggestions.
Charlie Collins